Adequacy front page
Stories Diaries Polls Users

Home About Topics Rejects Abortions
This is an archive site only. It is no longer maintained. You can not post comments. You can not make an account. Your email will not be read. Please read this page if you have questions.
 Debunking the Holocaust Hoax

 Author:  Topic:  Posted:
Jun 07, 2002
It seems hard to believe that less than 60 years ago we were naive enough to believe everything our government told us without question. It is even harder to imagine that today forces still exist in Washington who will stop at nothing to prevent the dissemination of pure, unadulterated Truth. It is time for the outrageous lies propagated for the past half century to be put to rest, and time for the real story behind one of the United States' greatest cover-ups to be told. We at Adequacy have uncovered incontrovertible proof that the so-called Nuclear "Holocaust" in Hiroshima and Nagasaki was in fact staged in a California movie studio.

More stories about Science
Why we must increase Space Weapons research - a proof from the Drake equation.
Eugenics: The choice for a superior generation
Knowledge Containment: A Tradition Under Attack
Caffeinated Mints: A Comparative Review
We Need Creationism In Our Schools
Sigmund Freud, Linux and The Narcissism of Minor Difference
The Treason of Creationism
We need more toxins
New medical study: Microsoft products better for your health
Which is the best way to predict the future ?
Amateur Psychology
Humans: Murderous Freaks of Nature?

More stories by

Misogyny: Why hurt when you can hate?
Understanding Ayn Rand through the music of Rush
The rise of pseudo-connoisseurship and beer
America is still the greatest
Adequacy sheds light at our darkest hour
Thomas Kinkade brings art back to the people
This week's top-selling music releases
Ken Kesey will go no furthur
Book Review: A pair of holiday novels
Why marijuana is the worst drug
Caffeinated Mints: A Comparative Review
Anakin Loses a Hand
The Enola Gay and &Pilot&
The Enola Gay and her "pilot"

By Summer of 1945 it had become apparent to Harry S. Truman and the rest of the US military leadership that they were not going to be able to defeat Japan the same way they crushed Germany. For starters, the Russians weren't very interested in helping them this time around. Adding to this was the difficulty of landing an invasion force on Japanese shores. Sure, there were similarities between crossing the English channel and crossing the Sea of Japan, but when the commanders took a closer look they realized that the Korea Strait was a whole bunch bigger than the Strait of Dover. Further, the military hadn't even gotten around to stocking the Korean Peninsula with US armed forces yet. There appeared to be no reasonable way to conquer the island nation.

Over on the other side of the battle line, Emperor Hirohito was getting a might bit sick of the war. The way he saw it, Japan's future would be better served by focusing on the rapidly developing field of consumer electronics than it would by dominating the Asian Pacific militarily. He was also running out of Kamikaze pilots. In late June he secretly met with Truman in Honolulu to craft a plan.

Little Boy & Fat Man
Little Boy (left) and Fat Man (right)

Hirohito was ready to surrender, but there was the issue of saving face. He knew his countrymen would never accept the idea that they had simply made a bad decision, so he and Truman came up with a way to make it appear that the Japanese surrender was completely justified. Under the influence of stiff cocktails, they invented a preposterous scientific theory involving splitting invisible particles in such a way that the resultant explosion was thousands of times more powerful than TNT. Then they would tell the world of 2 bombs being loaded with these invisible particles and then dropped on Japanese cities, completely "destroying" them in the process. As a final touch they named the project after the Manhattans they were drinking.

All of the above is not simply idle speculation on our part. We have uncovered concrete proof that the "bombings" of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were faked.

Destroyed Factory

In the picture above you see a destroyed factory, ostensibly located in Hiroshima and destroyed by an "Atom" bomb if we are to believe the photographer. However, utilizing highly specialized photographic analysis software previously only available to the CIA, we have discovered that this photo was not taken in Japan at all. The enlarged detail below reveals it to be set in a city on the opposite side of the Pacific:

Yes, the photo is a fake. Based on a detailed review of shadow angles and the location of the sign in the background it is plainly apparent that this shot was taken on Warner Brothers' Lot 5 in Hollywood California.

When we further investigate the Hollywood connection other irregularities start to crop up. As we all know from our history classes, the pilot of the plane Enola Gay was a man named Paul Warfield Tibbets, Jr. According to his biography, Tibbets was an Air Force man and a pilot through and through. Surely a man such as this would have no connections with the myth-making in Hollywood, right? Wrong. As we can plainly see from the Internet Movie Database, Paul Tibbets is in fact a longtime Hollywood insider. Pilot? No, but he plays one in Government hoaxes!

The Atomic Bomb Memorial Dome
The alleged Atomic Bomb Memorial Dome, surrounded in "ruins"

Noted World War II historian and Hollywood pundit Elenchos offers further insight into how the movie industry works, and how we can use this knowledge to further unveil this conspiracy:

[A]ll the names [are obviously] made up. Fat Man? Little Boy? Please. What kind of names are those for bombs? Or Tibbits. Absurd. And the "Sea of Japan"? That's like one of those placeholders you see in a movie script that sometimes never get replaced. You see them when the credits roll: "2nd woman", "Cashier in Department Store". I've heard rumors that in the original plan, the names Hiroshima and Nagasaki were just "Major Industrial Seaport" and "Second Major Industrial Seaport". You sometimes still see these titles used, in places where they neglected to replace them with the names they later made up for the "destroyed" cities.

Over in Japan the government was making its own magic. The image you see here is the Atomic Bomb Memorial Dome, allegedly taken shortly after the bombing in Hiroshima. This stark photograph is supposed to convey the devastation in that city with the one standing building embodying the strength and hope Hiroshima retained. This was a clever bit of trickery on the part of the Japanese, but recently unveiled archived items prove that this shot, like the one done in Hollywood, is a fake.

Several years ago a group of Japanese school children from Tokyo were on a field trip in Osaka visiting some of the many national treasures that city holds. At one point a few of them became separated from their group and wandered into a little-used basement portion of the building they were in. Behind a mysteriously unlocked door they discovered the smoking gun: They found one of the scale models that was used to create the fake devastation photos.

Scale model used to create fake photos
Scale model used to create fake photos

When the students attempted to alert others to their find they were quickly hushed by the government. Unfortunately, the proverbial cat had already escaped form his sacked confinement and people began to ask questions. Japanese officials managed to avoid the issue for months by brushing it off as "paranoid delusions", but eventually the demand became too great for them to ignore. In an attempt to quiet the restless public, a great ceremony was scheduled to be held at the Dome itself in Hiroshima to mark what was supposed to be the 50th anniversary of the bombing there. Press from around the world was invited.

When the event arrived the press was present in full force, enticed at the possibility that the 50 year long lie would be revealed. Remarkably though, there was indeed a dome, looking much like it did in the old pictures. The conspiracy advocates were set back and unsure of where they stood until a Hiroshima resident leaked the photo below in late 1999. The Atomic Dome was in fact new, as demonstrated by the construction scaffolding which surrounded it only a few short years ago.

New dome with scaffolding

After years of dedicated research we have finally uncovered the incontrovertible proof and been able to make the duplicity of the US and Japanese governments publicly known. Unfortunately we are not afforded the time to savor our accomplishments. The holocaust hoax was not an isolated incident, but merely one occurrence in a long and ongoing string of deceit. Even as you read this, US "military forces" are purportedly engaging in "battle", in a country allegedly "full of caves", while only a few hundred miles away two other "countries" are hovering on the brink of yet another "nuclear holocaust", supposedly because they disagree on a chunk of mountainous terrain named after a Led Zeppelin song. Knowing of past deception is not enough. The world's leaders are playing at dangerous games which affect us all, and it is our duty to seek out the truth and expose those who would invent "facts" in order to further their own aims.


Russia vs Japan in WW2 (none / 0) (#8)
by Anonymous Reader on Fri Jun 7th, 2002 at 09:05:03 AM PST
Not to pick...but Russia actually did want to help defeat Japan. That's one of the reasons we dropped the bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Besides, of course, the thought of having to invade an island nation full of people fanatically loyal to their emperor.

Stalin... (none / 0) (#9)
by hauntedattics on Fri Jun 7th, 2002 at 09:51:05 AM PST
waited until the last minute and sent a few token forces in the general direction of Japan. When the Japanese surrendered, he took advantage of being one of the "victors" to claim the Sakhalin Islands for the Soviet Union.

Why on earth would we drop bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki just because "Russia" "wanted" to defeat Japan? Are you some sort of dirty revisionist or something?

USSR was reason for "bomb" (none / 0) (#34)
by Stealth Tuna on Mon Jun 10th, 2002 at 04:53:07 AM PST
Apparently the Western allies wanted to force an end to the war before the Russians got control of Mantchuria. On the other hand, it might just be a liberal myth too...

Kashmir: not named after Led Zeppelin (1.00 / 1) (#10)
by Anonymous Reader on Fri Jun 7th, 2002 at 11:22:37 AM PST
The region of Kashmir was around long before Led Zeppelin. Led Zeppelin named it after the place because the song had a Middle Eastern sound to it.

That is absurd (none / 0) (#11)
by Anonymous Reader on Fri Jun 7th, 2002 at 11:36:21 AM PST
If you had so much as a sliver of intelligence you might have noticed that Kashmir is not in the Mid-East. Thus, we must conclude that you are utterly and totally full of shit.

Whats next? ET's are in league with the goverment? (1.00 / 1) (#12)
by Glassdemon333 on Fri Jun 7th, 2002 at 11:44:10 AM PST
Ok so goverment out to get you, its all a cover up and the war with japan was almost a complete
lie? Lay off the X-files.

If only you knew... (4.00 / 1) (#22)
by Illiterate Bum on Fri Jun 7th, 2002 at 11:34:50 PM PST
There are a lot of scary things happening in the world today, my friend. People like you will be the first against the wall when the lizards finally come clean.

"...normal, balanced people do not waste time posting to weblogs." --tkatchev

look (1.00 / 1) (#32)
by Glassdemon333 on Sun Jun 9th, 2002 at 10:24:00 PM PST
take a deep breath, ok? see the world that isn't a acid trip? yeah thats real life.

Real life?! REAL LIFE?! (4.00 / 1) (#33)
by Illiterate Bum on Mon Jun 10th, 2002 at 02:00:15 AM PST
How do you know that this so-called "real life" isn't just a clever illusion maintained by our Ananuki Lizard overlords? HUH?! How do I know that you exist outside of this digitized world of ones and zeroes?

Fool. Prove to me that your so-called "real life" actually exists as a physical manifestation. Prove to me why your reality is superior or more believable than my reality, my friend. Give me 10 good reasons why I should subscribe to your boring little newsletter.

And fix your grammar while you're at it, damn it. Let me give you a little help.

"Take a deep breath, OK? See the world that isn't an acid trip? Yeah, that's real life."

"Real life?" Bah.

"...normal, balanced people do not waste time posting to weblogs." --tkatchev

How do I know? (none / 0) (#44)
by because it isnt on Mon Jun 17th, 2002 at 12:30:34 PM PST
I KNOW, because WARNER BROS paid a FUCKTON of money to DESCARTES for the MOVIE RIGHTS to his TWO-BIT PHILOSOPHICAL QUANDARY and they SURE AS HELL ain't letting no ANAKIN LIZARDS beat them to a SEQUEL!!!1! -- because it isn't

Isn't Warner Brothers lot 5... (none / 0) (#13)
by Anonymous Reader on Fri Jun 7th, 2002 at 12:05:32 PM PST
...where the Animaniacs live? A brilliant diversionary tactic, for sure.

More on the "Atomic Bomb" hoax. (5.00 / 3) (#14)
by Anonymous Reader on Fri Jun 7th, 2002 at 12:09:05 PM PST
Here's an early article about the hoax that was first posted to Usenet back in '92. (I can't believe I managed to track this down. Do I get an award of some sort?)

25 Questions and Answers about the "Atomic Bomb"

Next Time You Doctor a Photograph.... (none / 0) (#15)
by Anonymous Reader on Fri Jun 7th, 2002 at 01:36:39 PM PST
get the facts straight at least.

Up until 1949, the sign read "HollywoodLand" when the Hollywood Chamber of Commerce removed the last four letters and fixed the sign up.

Now that's just silly. (none / 0) (#29)
by Anonymous Reader on Sun Jun 9th, 2002 at 12:20:44 PM PST
Since we know the film industry was in on it, it's easy to understand how this happened. "LAND" was removed from the sign so that "HOLLYWOOD" would be barely seen in some photographs, then put back for a few years. It was later removed in a ploy to make us skeptical observers look like hoaxers! Come on now, don't tell me you're so gullible you don't think the authorities can remove a few painted bits of metal overnight and put them back the next day. They could have simply used helicopters to lift the letters out.

so it was a hoax (1.00 / 1) (#16)
by Anonymous Reader on Fri Jun 7th, 2002 at 02:50:04 PM PST
so how did nearly over 200,000 people in Japan die from radiation if there was no cause for it!?

You are such an idiot


Power of the Mind (none / 0) (#17)
by Anonymous Reader on Fri Jun 7th, 2002 at 03:16:00 PM PST
the so-called "radiation sickness" is the product of massive Hollywood (coincidence? I think not) brainwashing of the masses. Actually, radiation is entirely beneficial, prolongs life, increses potency, and promotes hair growth. "Real" radiation sickness would increase the longevity of the population to the point that they would reproduce themselves into mass starvation; thus the government-hollywood axis of conspiracy has agreed to promulgate this mistaken belief. The power of the media is well demonstrated in those persons being treated for cancer with radiation, who ACTUALLY DEVELOP the alleged symptoms, in spite of there being no real reason to do so. Clearly, if radiation were dangerous as the conspiracy alleges, we wouldn't be treating cancer patients with it!!!
This demonstrates how we develop the symptoms we are told we will, not those which are actually resultant from the phenomenon in question.

Exactly (none / 0) (#23)
by Anonymous Reader on Sat Jun 8th, 2002 at 03:06:09 AM PST
An excellent and informative post. The so-called "epidemics" of "Chronic Fatigue Syndrome", "Repetitive Strain Injury" and "Attention Deficit Disorder" are similar examples; demonstrating conclusively how the liberal-controlled mass media can spread outbreaks of hysteria among the weak-minded masses.

indy fella... (none / 0) (#18)
by Anonymous Reader on Fri Jun 7th, 2002 at 03:37:49 PM PST
... you must be really stupid to dispute these (proven by high-end tech) facts...

Gosh man what kind of sicko are you not believeing your own eyes?

Moroever, I m quite sure you can't name not even one of these supposed victims (at least even one of their living relatives)

As said in matrix, many people are not ready for REAL life and will struggle to prove the false beliefs they've been fed all their lives.

At least you should stop calling people names unless you can present us with some solid evidence (though i don't think you can).

ta ta

because..... (none / 0) (#36)
by Anonymous Reader on Tue Jun 11th, 2002 at 04:58:46 AM PST
Hollywood has very, VERY realistic props

I cannot believe... (none / 0) (#52)
by Anonymous Reader on Tue Aug 6th, 2002 at 01:15:30 AM PST
How stupid can the people that replied to this post be? Rad treatment targets an area the size of a pin head and damages every organ around the cancer; It makes your hair fall out, it makes you sick, and infertile. The dose that the people of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were exposed to was a thousand times that of what they use in a Rad treatment. You people are stupid.

Finally (none / 0) (#19)
by Anonymous Reader on Fri Jun 7th, 2002 at 03:51:52 PM PST
I thought I was alone. But there you are. Honest men of good will like us will reval the truth. Soon, I'll demonstrate that there were no such thing like Pearl Harbor. Pearl Harbor doen't even exist. Nor McArthur.
After demonstrating all that, I will prove you that I don't exist.

Proof? (none / 0) (#20)
by First Incision on Fri Jun 7th, 2002 at 04:58:24 PM PST
An Anoymous Reader proving he doesn't exist? That shouldn't be too hard.
Do you suffer from late-night hacking? Ask your doctor about Protonix.

Obviously... (none / 0) (#21)
by faustus on Fri Jun 7th, 2002 at 06:35:50 PM PST
Hiroshima did happen. I read a book on it once in grade 9, so it must of happened.
What then could of prompt this blatent delusion and outrageous lie? Adequacy has a history of very exact, yet controversial articles; so we can write off any attempts by the editors of spreading disinformation, and therefore the article must be a grand delusion.

When you consider that the general populace of Adequacy is made up of American jingoists, the cause behind this delusion becomes clear as Mexican well water. Simply, after 40 years of revising the reasons to drop the A-bomb on the innocent Japanese, the American public, of which Adequacy represents, has realized that the act was simply barbaric and unnessecary. How ironic that, "the greatest country in the world" is the only one to use man's most horrific weapon. The cognitive dissonance that arises from this contradiction produces a guilt so overpowering, that a massive delusion has been subconsciously created to absolve the reponsibilities of America's bloody and atomic past.

We can only hope the guilt surrounding the Slave Trade can be dealt with in a more healthy and constructive manner, or America is in for a long scizophrenic decline into the morrass from which she arose.

--You seem to be suffering from a liberal-arts education.

Debunking the Debunker (none / 0) (#24)
by gohomeandshoveit on Sat Jun 8th, 2002 at 02:27:36 PM PST
Ok: 3 questions for good ol' zikzak:

One: Did the CIA really have access to Photoshop before the public?

Two: Have you ever read any documentation on nuclear physics? Einstein's equation E=mc2 (energy equals mass times the speed of light squared) proves that you can generate a tremendous amount of energy from only a small amount of mass.

Three: If Truman and Hirohito named the project after the Manhattans they were drinking, then why did the Manhattan Project begin under Franklin D. Roosevelt?

Conclusion: Mr. zikzak must get his misinformation in line with history before he tries to dupe the rest of the Adequacy readers.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------If ignorance is bliss, then knock the smile off my face.

A flawed rebuttal (4.50 / 2) (#25)
by First Incision on Sat Jun 8th, 2002 at 04:42:00 PM PST
You claim that this "E=MC^2" equation "proves" the atomic bomb. What exactly does this prove? It's just a couple of letters and numbers. Assuming that all this documentation on nuclear physics (real scientists call it "literature," by the way) supports "E=MC^2" as valid, that does not prove that the construction of such a bomb was feasible in the 1940's.

And of course they are going to say the Manhattan Project started during the Roosevelt administration. No one would believe you could construct a magic bomb in less than a few years! A multi-year history for a secret government agency full of scientists would not be the hardest part of faking an atomic holocaust.
Do you suffer from late-night hacking? Ask your doctor about Protonix.

get two pieces of wire (none / 0) (#50)
by Anonymous Reader on Wed Jul 10th, 2002 at 04:53:37 AM PST
and put them into the next socket. Then you will feel that E=mc^2 is valid.

by the way: mass and speed of light are uncapitalized

Please... (none / 0) (#31)
by Q on Sun Jun 9th, 2002 at 03:17:04 PM PST
Have you ever read any documentation on nuclear physics? Einstein's equation E=mc2 (energy equals mass times the speed of light squared) proves that you can generate a tremendous amount of energy from only a small amount of mass.

Proves? Come on, so you can use E=mc^2 to better estimate, say, kinetic energy of an object by calculating the increase in its mass as the function of its velocity, but really, do these fancy physics in any way "prove" that you can "generate" energy from mass?

It's like saying that you can generate infinite energy by singling out quarks - scientist's only conclusion would be that quarks can not be singled.

In exactly the same way, the irrefutable debunking of the little "evidence" we have about use of atomic "bombs," done by such a trustworthy source as Adequacy, and considering the fact that empires like USA and USSR would doubtlessly use such a power were it available to them, indicates without doubt that "atomic bombs" are infeasible, and their "existence" is only a myth.

I truly hope that Adequacy helps you not to be deluded into believing lies based on the so-called "scientific arguments," such as those that imply possibility of "converting" mass into energy.

well letīs deny the nazi concentration camps (1.00 / 1) (#26)
by Anonymous Reader on Sat Jun 8th, 2002 at 05:57:01 PM PST
while we are at it the german people are a made up line of fantasy creatures that only exists in satanic books by astrid lindgren

This story... (1.00 / 1) (#28)
by Anonymous Reader on Sat Jun 8th, 2002 at 08:24:44 PM PST
has to be a joke. No one could be stupid enough to believe any of this.

Unfortunately, it's not really that funny.

Are you a grown-up? (none / 0) (#30)
by Narcissus on Sun Jun 9th, 2002 at 01:47:22 PM PST
This site is for grown-ups who wish to be controversial.

I think I speak for all the grown-ups here that this story is very informative and has a certain dry humor to it, seeing that it is presumably satirical and all.

And who are you to tell someone that their opinion is a joke. I don't think you are God or any person of a divine nature, last I checked I was the only one here with that distinction.

Ok, who picked the flower???

Fool. (1.00 / 1) (#38)
by Anonymous Reader on Wed Jun 12th, 2002 at 09:41:05 AM PST
Satire? This is certainly not satire and I'm sure it was written with the utmost of good faith. Close-minded idiot. You're being deluded boy, your government has you wrapped around its little finger. Wake up and smell the coffee...if it were not for revisionists like us the truth would have been lost long ago.

Revisionism does not equal truth. (4.00 / 1) (#39)
by hauntedattics on Wed Jun 12th, 2002 at 11:35:44 AM PST
Get a grip already.

Enola "Gay" (1.00 / 1) (#35)
by Anonymous Reader on Tue Jun 11th, 2002 at 04:35:30 AM PST
Actually the photo at the top of your page proved that you were right: The plane was called "Enola Gay" and the man waving looked rather "Gay" to me. In fact, I have read that a lot of Hollywood Producers, Directors and Actors are in fact "GAY"!!!! Thankyou!

Booooo! (1.00 / 1) (#42)
by derek3000 on Thu Jun 13th, 2002 at 12:21:14 PM PST
What a terrible fucking joke. If it weren't for all the boos, you'd be drowning in a sea of cricket racket.

"Feel me when I bring it!" --Gay Jamie

A wider conspiracy? (1.00 / 1) (#37)
by Anonymous Reader on Tue Jun 11th, 2002 at 03:59:25 PM PST
I find it curious that zikzak has unveiled the actor Paul Tibbets, but has failed to comment on the presence of actors and film producers throughout the world's governments.
A few examples -
United States: Ronald Reagan, Sonny Bono, Jesse Ventura
Cambodia: King Sihanouk
Philippines: President Estrada
Are you attempting to distract us from this wider hoax, zikzak, or can we expect a future article on this global conspiracy?

fact of publication (1.00 / 1) (#40)
by Anonymous Reader on Wed Jun 12th, 2002 at 08:54:45 PM PST
I've never been so close to really understanding such an important period of world history, and how easily manipulated history actually is. Pure enlightenment--swift and clear as medical grade ether.

Come on (1.00 / 1) (#41)
by Anonymous Reader on Thu Jun 13th, 2002 at 10:42:43 AM PST
Come on now people. Anyone who believe this has watched a few too many X-Files episodes.
The atom bomb was developed by many famous physicists worked on the A-Bomb, including Richard P. Feynman. Ever heard of him? As well as a little known person named Albert Eintstien. Both of these great minds had a part in the creation of the bomb, and to think that these two would be "in" on this "great conspiracy" is just madness.
Why is it that nuts like this always try to disprove an act that was done by their own country against a group of people? Why don't they ever try to diprove things that were done to their own country? Why not try to disprove that September 11th didn't happen. Or maybe Pearl Harbor didn't happen either. It's very easy to look at an event like the dropping of the A-Bomb, and say it didn't happen, simply because your own people/country didn't directly see the results.

Why do you believe everything you are told ? (none / 0) (#43)
by dmg on Sun Jun 16th, 2002 at 01:45:22 PM PST
It is widely accepted that the Gulf war never happened and there are plenty of people who have their doubts about the official version of the September 11th events.

time to give a Newtonian demonstration - of a bullet, its mass and its acceleration.
-- MC Hawking

*ponder* (none / 0) (#46)
by Anonymous Reader on Thu Jun 20th, 2002 at 03:12:00 PM PST
The Holocaust is what Adolf Hitler and the Nazi forces did to the Jews, you dumbass, not the dropping of atomic weapons on Japan.

Attempted Genocide == Holocaust
Atomic Bombing != Holocaust

*idiot* (none / 0) (#47)
by Anonymous Reader on Fri Jun 21st, 2002 at 10:48:58 PM PST
Main Entry: ho·lo·caust

Etymology: Middle English, from Old French holocauste, from Late Latin holocaustum, from Greek holokauston, from neuter of holokaustos burnt whole, from hol- + kaustos burnt, from kaiein to burn -- more at CAUSTIC
Date: 13th century
1 : a sacrifice consumed by fire
2 : a thorough destruction involving extensive loss of life especially through fire <a nuclear holocaust>
3 a : often capitalized : the mass slaughter of European civilians and especially Jews by the Nazis during World War II -- usually used with the
3 b : a mass slaughter of people; especially : GENOCIDE

See 3: a. (none / 0) (#51)
by Anonymous Reader on Wed Jul 24th, 2002 at 10:22:10 PM PST
for the definition of what the original author is refering to. A holocaust in the nuclear sense would be A holocaust, not THE Holocaust that is capitalized and a proper noun in history. Nobody has to ask what you're talking about when you say The Holocaust, as the author did. Were you to say A holocaust, one would have to ask you to specify the specific incident. Thanks. Later.

idiot (none / 0) (#48)
by Anonymous Reader on Fri Jul 5th, 2002 at 02:06:47 AM PST

debunking the holocaust hoax (none / 0) (#49)
by Anonymous Reader on Tue Jul 9th, 2002 at 07:37:58 PM PST
oh how I wish it was all true , a hollywood hoax , all those horribly burn japanese people too I bet, the one that are dead what can they said if their could .. your mama

donkeyballs (none / 0) (#53)
by Anonymous Reader on Wed Aug 7th, 2002 at 06:54:20 AM PST
and you suck them, how can you ignore something like that. what are you, a fucking nazi


All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective companies. Comments are owned by the Poster. The Rest ® 2001, 2002, 2003 The name, logo, symbol, and taglines "News for Grown-Ups", "Most Controversial Site on the Internet", "Linux Zealot", and "He just loves Open Source Software", and the RGB color value: D7D7D7 are trademarks of No part of this site may be republished or reproduced in whatever form without prior written permission by and, if and when applicable, prior written permission by the contributing author(s), artist(s), or user(s). Any inquiries are directed to