Adequacy front page
Stories Diaries Polls Users
Google

Web Adequacy.org
Home About Topics Rejects Abortions
This is an archive site only. It is no longer maintained. You can not post comments. You can not make an account. Your email will not be read. Please read this page if you have questions.
 What IS adequacy all about????

 Author:  Topic:  Posted:
Apr 13, 2002
 Comments:
What is Adequacy all about? From what I have read, many of the posts and articles are satire while some happen to be serious and some maybe are trolls. Its been debated before I think but people only ever scratch the surface.

Here I intend to write what I think it is all about and to show you something dark and sinister I have discovered about this...place.

diaries

More diaries by PotatoError
Hackers: Misunderstood
To all you Windows Criminals
The financial time bomb
Too controversial for Adequacy
A big HI! from Linuz Zealot
Linux Zealot Tells a Story
Why the GNU licence is a good thing
Why copying copyrighted music isnt wrong.
Okay I'll pay for music
Poz techie seeks same. T-count above 10000.
Human behaviour - my thinking on it
Patenting of hyperlinks
Question
The little things
What is god?
awww
Iraq, Israel, Palestine and Afghanistan
The consequences of Determinism
I think nuclear weapons are good
Where are we going?
Secret World Conspiricy Revealed!!!
Diary Entry 24/05/02
The Internet - where is it heading?
Terrifying and Shocking news
w0w I must be 1337 h4X0r
An Introduction to Online Gaming
Why Al-Qeada isn't responsible for the WTC
Linux Zealot - My thoughts about him
How many Adequacy members are there?
Why Internet Piracy is Moral
Trees and Grass. Two more lies of society.
Why US bombs should be banned
The Hunt for God
My vacation to America and what I found there
Are you an Enemy Combatant?
Rock vs Pop
Why we should make all guns illegal
Invasion: America
One Year since 9/11 and Americans haven't changed
Yes there are serious articles and piss-take articles here. Some people critise other sites and some other sites critise them. But i think that shouldnt be in it, unless you really think so.

Adequacy is really good for stories and information and stuff. It suceeds where all other sites fail..but is it just all of it or is there another, deeper dark part to adequacy?

I think there was something put which made us not allowed to question anything..or anyone here for that matter. But regardless of that I must try to at least attempt to try and sum it up. Because who else will try do it too?

I think its been about 5 months since I got here.. because it was less than before doesnt mean that I cant speak about it at all..quite the opposite of that - if you know what I mean.

Maybe some people here think its not actually here for something but I think that the other sites are missing a bit of it really. When I say that, I mean that it isnt what could be done without proper thought. Of course some people would argue - that based on the earlier assumption that it might not have succeeded as they predicted. Well, that's just opinion and while opinion might be fact if its not in the context of whats here it might also not be whats really important.

The one thing noticble about adequacy is the depth of itself compared to other ones. I imagined that it came of chance but now I think it is a far more mysterious thing. Like why exactly cant we figure out why? We are here for a reason yes or no? We dont know - thats simply put but not a direct way to solve a piece of it. Another point is there is SOMETHING in the background. I dont know what, but its alive in some way which isnt like we think of. Its not so much controling as created by all of us. Maybe its just a lot of it in the same area. Afterall, haven't we seen many of it before in other places? Im sure thats true..at least I hope. The alternative is very dire. Whats not true is what really goes on - the sum of its parts...which is us. Unless of course you think that we aren't parts but that we are just part of something else. That's going off topic though.

So to sum it up - I dont believe it is possible to fully understand Adequacy. So would people stop trying..not that they can't have the right to thinking it as is happening here..I dont want to destroy my own post I think...but I dont know if thats covered by what Ive said. hmmm interesting.

       
Tweet

Your my hero (none / 0) (#1)
by Anonymous Reader on Sat Apr 13th, 2002 at 06:00:00 PM PST
That's the best thing I've seen posted here for a while. You are quite right in your analysis and I agree that the alternative is dire, indeed.


 
Throw the horse over the fence some hay (5.00 / 3) (#2)
by zikzak on Sat Apr 13th, 2002 at 06:49:08 PM PST
You have given me a headache.


Seconded. (none / 0) (#6)
by hauntedattics on Sun Apr 14th, 2002 at 07:22:34 AM PST
Pass the Advil (TM).



 
It is rather weird (5.00 / 2) (#3)
by walwyn on Sat Apr 13th, 2002 at 07:18:27 PM PST
reading someone tripping.


 
You're Inadequate... (5.00 / 1) (#4)
by gzt on Sat Apr 13th, 2002 at 08:48:56 PM PST
For even having to post this question. You're even more inadequate because you can't speak English (this criticism is withdrawn if it ain't your native tongue).

The secret behind this place is that it is run by a cabal of supermen and hyper-sexy women-type-things. Their extreme adequacy in all aspects of life gives this site a vibrant excellence that permeates all aspects of its glorious existence.

At least you have one thing right: "I dont believe it is possible to fully understand Adequacy. So would people stop trying." Plebeians beware! You can't understand, so don't bother.


 
Unfair accusations in this diary. (5.00 / 1) (#5)
by Anonymous Reader on Sat Apr 13th, 2002 at 09:06:50 PM PST
I believe this diary entry unfairly accuses some of the writers here, much as I once did when I first started reading this site (just days ago).

In my view, the diaries and news articles here are written by people who hold strong viewpoints. We should not make accusations of untruth against those people, merely because their viewpoints seem outrageous or far-fetched. Many people hold views you may find outlandish, but we must learn to respect them for who they are.

-- Uncanny Vortex



 
Umm... (5.00 / 1) (#7)
by Anonymous Reader on Sun Apr 14th, 2002 at 09:55:00 AM PST
Shit, I just dropped my pocket.


 
Sweet Jesus. (none / 0) (#8)
by derek3000 on Sun Apr 14th, 2002 at 10:18:24 AM PST
I've never seen someone with so little command of the English language.

Oh, wait--there was that foreign exchange student I fingerbanged last night.


----------------
"Feel me when I bring it!" --Gay Jamie

Fingerbanged? (none / 0) (#11)
by hauntedattics on Sun Apr 14th, 2002 at 04:47:58 PM PST
As hard as I'm trying to ignore it, I'm seeing a pattern here...



This is hardly fair. (5.00 / 1) (#12)
by derek3000 on Sun Apr 14th, 2002 at 09:28:09 PM PST
Attacking my sexual prowess in a public forum is truly 'below the belt', as it were. Forgive me if I have a different skill set than most of the liberalist men out there.


----------------
"Feel me when I bring it!" --Gay Jamie

rule of thumb, eh? n/t (5.00 / 1) (#14)
by nathan on Mon Apr 15th, 2002 at 05:27:52 AM PST

--
Li'l Sis: Yo, that's a real grey area. Even by my lax standards.

Yes, (5.00 / 1) (#15)
by derek3000 on Mon Apr 15th, 2002 at 06:14:00 AM PST
because thumbtimes you're right, and thumbtimes you're wrong.


----------------
"Feel me when I bring it!" --Gay Jamie

Oh (5.00 / 1) (#17)
by Ernest Bludger on Mon Apr 15th, 2002 at 11:36:40 PM PST
pull your finger out!!


 
Wait a sec. (none / 0) (#16)
by hauntedattics on Mon Apr 15th, 2002 at 11:04:33 AM PST
I wasn't attacking your sexual prowess, merely (reluctantly) pointing out a trend. You should be proud of your skill set, it's terrific, it's wonderful, etc., etc.

This crow is bitter. Can I stop eating it now?



 
It is simple (none / 0) (#9)
by Anonymous Reader on Sun Apr 14th, 2002 at 10:32:42 AM PST
Adequacy is a place where the common intellectual rabble dance for the amusement of the all-powerful editors.


 
Ow (none / 0) (#10)
by DG on Sun Apr 14th, 2002 at 12:54:14 PM PST
what the hell was this about? i couldn't wade through all the conflicting words. Potatoerror you gave me a headache, it hurts worse becuse of my hangover, next time read over your posts a bit. otherwise it made no sense
2002, DG. You may not reproduce this material, in whole or in part, without written permission of the owner.

 
It worked for Coleridge, (5.00 / 1) (#13)
by jvance on Sun Apr 14th, 2002 at 10:13:25 PM PST
Kesey, Kerouac, and even Philip K Dick, but I'm afraid it's not working for you.
--
Adequacy has turned into a cesspool consisting of ... blubbering, superstitious fools arguing with smug, pseudointellectual assholes. -AR

 

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective companies. Comments are owned by the Poster. The Rest ® 2001, 2002, 2003 Adequacy.org. The Adequacy.org name, logo, symbol, and taglines "News for Grown-Ups", "Most Controversial Site on the Internet", "Linux Zealot", and "He just loves Open Source Software", and the RGB color value: D7D7D7 are trademarks of Adequacy.org. No part of this site may be republished or reproduced in whatever form without prior written permission by Adequacy.org and, if and when applicable, prior written permission by the contributing author(s), artist(s), or user(s). Any inquiries are directed to legal@adequacy.org.