Adequacy front page
Stories Diaries Polls Users

Home About Topics Rejects Abortions
This is an archive site only. It is no longer maintained. You can not post comments. You can not make an account. Your email will not be read. Please read this page if you have questions.
Worst threat to world peace?
Britain 12%
England 37%
The United Kingdom 12%
Great Britain 0%
The Commonwealth 37%

Votes: 8

 The UK is endangering world peace

 Author:  Topic:  Posted:
Mar 21, 2002
Just when we thought the world was safe again, those war-like Brits are at it again. According to the BBC news they are planning to embark upon thermonuclear war.

More diaries by theantix
Adequacy is full of fascists bug report
It's April 1 everyone
The new hacker threat
Fascist Adequacy editors denying me my rights
Is this a new form of British Imperialism, or something new? Hopefully a peace-loving nation will step up and crush them before they can do any real damage. First it was the French, and now this! Common sense dictates that European nations should be barred from owning nuclear weapons. It would be a first important step towards world peace.


If it wasn't for us war-like Brits (3.00 / 2) (#2)
by iat on Thu Mar 21st, 2002 at 10:42:34 AM PST
If it wasn't for our love of combat, the American army would still be getting its arse spanked over in Afghanistan. Fortunately, 1,700 of Britain's finest soldiers are prepared to risk their lives to defend world peace and prevent the cowardly and inept American army being involved in another embarrassing conflict like Vietnam. - love it or leave it.

Agreed (3.00 / 2) (#5)
by theantix on Thu Mar 21st, 2002 at 12:15:09 PM PST
The Americans should be thanking their lucky stars that they have so much assistance in this latest regional conflict. Without the guidance of the Kiwis, the experience of the Canucks, and the courage of the Brits... the Americans would again be handed a massive defeat.

Hear hear (3.00 / 2) (#6)
by budlite on Thu Mar 21st, 2002 at 12:17:31 PM PST
It's hypocritical for someone from a country that has used nuclear weapons in anger to criticise another country's administration for suggesting the mere possibility of their use.

An afterthought (3.00 / 2) (#7)
by budlite on Thu Mar 21st, 2002 at 12:20:16 PM PST
Your vision of a peace-loveing US. It doesn't involve nuking the hell out of any country that daren't follow the USian "example", does it?

You make an incorrect assumption, sir (3.00 / 2) (#8)
by theantix on Thu Mar 21st, 2002 at 12:28:31 PM PST
I'm from a noble country where the phrase "peace, order and good government" isn't just an empty motto, but a way of life.

Sorry (3.00 / 2) (#9)
by budlite on Thu Mar 21st, 2002 at 12:34:38 PM PST
But that post was kind of in the "It's everyone else's fault but the US'" vein. I hope I never insult any non-USians by assuming they're from that uptight land again.

Don't back off now (5.00 / 1) (#10)
by walwyn on Thu Mar 21st, 2002 at 03:44:39 PM PST
Canada isn't adverse to spreading atomic bombs about.

The activity also has the added benefit of removing troublesome groups.

How... (none / 0) (#11)
by hauntedattics on Fri Mar 22nd, 2002 at 09:40:36 AM PST
did the U.S. use its atomic bombs 'in anger'? I mean, it's not like it was a drive-by shooting or a knife fight over a woman or some such.

Probably not the best term (none / 0) (#12)
by budlite on Fri Mar 22nd, 2002 at 10:28:24 AM PST
I mean, that the US actually used nuclear weapons.

LOL (1.00 / 1) (#3)
by Anonymous Reader on Thu Mar 21st, 2002 at 11:57:26 AM PST
The USA a peace loving nation !!!!

Its true (1.00 / 1) (#4)
by PotatoError on Thu Mar 21st, 2002 at 12:01:28 PM PST
Millions of Britons are being trained in secret for the upcoming War.


All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective companies. Comments are owned by the Poster. The Rest ® 2001, 2002, 2003 The name, logo, symbol, and taglines "News for Grown-Ups", "Most Controversial Site on the Internet", "Linux Zealot", and "He just loves Open Source Software", and the RGB color value: D7D7D7 are trademarks of No part of this site may be republished or reproduced in whatever form without prior written permission by and, if and when applicable, prior written permission by the contributing author(s), artist(s), or user(s). Any inquiries are directed to